Last week I was traveling and stopped for a cup of coffee. Two retired gentlemen were already seated when I sat down nearby. I couldn't help overhearing their conversation. They talked the entire time I was there, but when I got up to leave, it occurred to me they really hadn't talked about anything. They were simply filling the time.
I found myself becoming annoyed. Not because they were talking. They had every right to enjoy their morning. What bothered me was something entirely different. I kept thinking, Is this really what we've reduced retirement to? The conversation stayed with me the rest of the day. In fact, it caused me to ask a question that has been nagging at me ever since:
Have we been asking the wrong question about retirement?
I have spent more than forty years helping people prepare for retirement, and during that time I have watched hundreds of people make the transition from their careers into whatever comes next. Some flourish. Others seem to begin withdrawing, not only from work but from challenge, relationships, responsibility and, in some cases, life itself. The interesting part is that the difference often has very little to do with money. That realization has slowly changed the way I think about retirement. For decades we have treated it primarily as a financial event. We ask how much we will need, when we can stop working, whether Social Security will be enough, how to protect ourselves from inflation and taxes, and whether our investments will last. Those are important questions, and I spend much of my professional life helping people answer them. But I have begun wondering whether we have become so focused on financing retirement that we have neglected to ask what retirement is actually for.
Perhaps part of the problem is that we are still operating under a twentieth-century model. It was built during a time when people worked, retired and generally did not expect to live another twenty-five or thirty healthy years. Retirement became the reward for having endured work long enough. You reached a certain age, received the gold watch and began winding down. That may have made sense in another era. I am not convinced it makes sense now. We are living longer. Many people remain healthy, capable and active well into their seventies and eighties. If we are going to live longer, does it not follow that we should also expect to remain engaged longer? Yet we continue treating sixty-five as though it were some natural dividing line between usefulness and irrelevance. It is not a law of nature. It is an inherited convention.
I also wonder how many of us quietly assume we will live about as long as our parents did. We may never say it aloud, but I suspect that expectation shapes more of our decisions than we realize. If our parents slowed down at seventy, perhaps we assume we should do the same. If they died at seventy-eight, perhaps some part of us begins preparing for decline years earlier. Beliefs have consequences. If we believe our best years are behind us, we may begin acting accordingly. We may lower our expectations, stop taking risks, stop learning and gradually withdraw before our bodies require it. I do not know how often that happens, but I have seen enough to believe the question deserves more attention.
Years ago I was introduced to the writings of Sir John Templeton, and his attitude toward aging stayed with me. He did not see the later years of life as a period of decline. He saw them as years in which growth could continue. The older I get, the more persuasive I find that idea. We understand compounding when it comes to money. We encourage young people to begin saving early because small investments, given enough time, can grow into something substantial. But why would we assume that only money compounds? Experience compounds. Judgment compounds. Wisdom compounds. Relationships compound. Perspective compounds. The ability to recognize patterns, avoid mistakes and help others often becomes more valuable with time, not less. It seems strange to spend a lifetime accumulating those assets and then decide, at the very moment they have matured, that they are no longer needed.
That is one reason I have trouble with the way retirement is often portrayed. Too often it is presented as the beginning of a long period of consumption. We work, save and sacrifice so that one day we can travel, play golf, eat out, sit on the beach and enjoy the grandchildren. There is nothing wrong with any of those things. I hope to enjoy all of them. But I do not believe consumption, by itself, can sustain a meaningful life. Pleasure is not the same thing as purpose. Leisure can refresh us, but it cannot carry the full weight of our identity. When retirement becomes little more than finding ways to fill the time, I think something essential has been lost.
That may be especially difficult for business owners. I have watched many struggle with retirement, and I once assumed it was because they simply loved working. I now think it is more complicated. Business owners spend decades solving problems, making decisions, building relationships, leading people and creating something larger than themselves. Their work becomes intertwined with their identity and their sense of usefulness.
Over the years, I have also come to define retirement differently. To me, retirement is doing what you want to do without worrying about the money. Notice what that definition does not say. It does not say you stop contributing. It does not say you stop building. It does not say you stop serving. It simply means you now have the financial freedom to decide where your time and energy are best invested.
That is why I have come to believe retirement planning must involve much more than a portfolio and an income projection. A financial plan is a remarkable tool, but it is still only a tool. Its purpose is to create freedom. What we choose to do with that freedom is a much more important question.
Throughout our lives we accumulate gifts, opportunities, relationships, experience and wisdom. Whatever their source, I've come to believe they are entrusted to us for a purpose. They're not simply ours to enjoy; they're ours to develop and put to work. Retirement may change how we use them, but I'm not convinced it changes our responsibility.
Technology may make this distinction even more important. Artificial intelligence is already changing the way people work, learn, create and communicate. For older adults, I believe that presents an extraordinary opportunity. Someone with decades of experience can now use technology to organize ideas, teach others, mentor more people, create new ventures and extend the reach of a lifetime of knowledge. Far from making experienced people obsolete, these tools may allow them to become more useful than ever. The limiting factor may not be age. It may be whether we still believe we have something to contribute.
Which brings me back to the coffee shop. Those two gentlemen did absolutely nothing wrong. They simply caused me to pause and consider what retirement can become when purpose is allowed to fade. I wondered how much experience, wisdom and ability might have been sitting at that table, and how many tables like it exist all across the country. Fruit is not sweetest when it is green. It is sweetest when it has ripened. Why should people be any different? Why should the years in which our judgment has matured and our perspective has deepened be treated as though they are merely the years we have left to consume?
I am not arguing that people should never stop working. I am arguing that work and purpose are not the same thing. Retirement should give us the freedom to choose how we use our time, not permission to stop using ourselves. Perhaps the right question is not, "When can I retire?" Perhaps it is, "What am I retiring to?" What will still require my attention? Who can benefit from what I have learned? What do I still want to build, teach, repair, create or understand? And what gifts, opportunities and experiences entrusted to me am I not yet finished putting to work?
If we truly are living longer, then financing those additional years is only part of the challenge. The greater challenge may be making those years matter. That is a conversation I believe more of us should be having, and perhaps we should begin long before the retirement party.
Integrity Benefit Partners
65 LaSalle Rd, Suite 200, West Hartford, CT 06107 | 860.521.401k | www.integritybenefitpartners.com
This material was created to provide accurate and reliable information on the subjects covered. It is not intended to provide specific legal, tax or other professional advice. The services of an appropriate professional should be sought regarding your individual situation. Integrity Benefit Partners and its affiliates do not provide legal or tax services.
Securities and investment advisory services offered through qualified registered representatives of MML Investors Services, LLC. Member SIPC. Integrity Benefit Partners is not a subsidiary or affiliate of MML Investors Services, LLC, or its affiliated companies. 1 Marina Park Drive, 16th Floor, Boston, MA 02116. 617-585-4500.